|
|
|
| > SFCA Home | Search | > Original Claim 5970 | > Claim 5970+ Summary | > Claim 5970 Maps | ◄► |
| No. of Claim | Name of Claimant | Description of Claimant | Address of Claimant | ||
| 5970 | The Most Noble Henry, Duke of Norfolk, The Right Honourable Edward George Fitzalan Howard, The Right Honourable William Bernard Lord Petre, The Right Honourable Henry Valentine Lord Stafford, John Abel Smith Esquire | The Most Noble Henry, Duke of Norfolk - Peer, The Right Honourable Edward George Fitzalan Howard - M.P, The Right Honourable William Bernard Lord Petre - Peer, The Right Honourable Henry Valentine Lord Stafford - Peer, John Abel Smith Esquire - M.P | The Most Noble Henry, Duke of Norfolk - Norfolk House, St James Square, County of Middlesex, The Right Honourable Edward George Fitzalan Howard - Glossop Hall in the County of Derby, The Right Honourable William Bernard Lord Petre - Thornton Hall, Brentwood in the County of Essex, The Right Honourable Henry Valentine Lord Stafford - Cossey Hall near Norwich in the County of Norfolk, John Abel Smith Esquire - Chester Square in the County of Middlesex |
| Nature of Claimant’s Interest | Particulars of Claim | Amount of Damages Claimed | ||||||
| The Claim is made in respect of injury to the Freehold of the Property specified of which the Claimants are owners and is exclusive of the Rights & Interest of the Tenants in respect of their several yearly holdings in such property or in the parts thereof respectively held by such Tenants | Schedule A referred to in the Annexed Claim | |||||||
| No. 1 Damages to Land situate adjoining the Sheffield and Penistone Turnpike Road at Owlerton in the Township of Nether Hallam in the Parish of Sheffield | ||||||||
| In respect of a Field called the Bridge Field and Garden Land, both held by Mr George Hawksley under a Yearly holding | Damage to and in part destruction of the Walls and Hedges, also destruction of the Gates and Posts, About 75 Yards of the Bank of the River Loxley adjoining to Bridge Field and being near to Owlerton Bridge, also about 80 Yards of Wall along such River near the same place washed away. Nearly 3 Acres of Land damaged requiring to be resoiled and first levelled. Damage to and in part destruction of the Occupation Road | £485 | 3s | |||||
| In respect of Another field called the Slack Field in same occupation | Destruction of Wall alongside the Turnpike Road and the Road to Slack Works. About 60 Yards of Wall along the River Loxley washed away | £43 | 13s | 4d | ||||
| No. 2 - Damages to the Road heading to Old Park Wood and to the Club Mill in the Township of Brightside Bierlow in the Parish of Sheffield | ||||||||
| Destruction of the Bridge over the Head Goit of the Sand Bed Tilt and of about 180 Yards of Bank and Fence along side the River Don and Damage to the Roadway | £212 | 11s | 11d | |||||
| No. 3 - Damages to the following new streets in the township of Brightside Bierlow | ||||||||
| Mowbray Street | ||||||||
| Saville Street | ||||||||
| Saville Street East | ||||||||
| Sutherland Street | ||||||||
| Greystock Street | ||||||||
| Corby Street | ||||||||
| Princess Street | ||||||||
| Farfield Street | ||||||||
| Norroy Street | ||||||||
| Lovele Street | ||||||||
| Blackmore Street | ||||||||
| Boylands Street | ||||||||
| Brightside Lane | ||||||||
| Damage caused by the Deposit of Mud in these several streets. Damage to the edge stones and Footways of Princess Street, Destruction of Walls in Princess Street and in Brightside Lane | £39 | 6s | 8d | |||||
| Note. Of this Sum of £39.16.8 The Claimants have already expended about £30 | ||||||||
| No. 4 - Damage to the Cattle Market in Sheffield | ||||||||
| In respect of the River Wall, Calf Shed and Urinals | Damage to and in part destruction of the River Wall, alongside the River Don, the Calf Shed and Cattle Pens, and the Urinals | £220 | 14s | 3d | ||||
| Note. Of this Sum of £220.14.3 the Claimants have already expended about £200 | ||||||||
| Note. The Claimants have not deemed it necessary to make any claim in respect of injury done to property held by Lessees and in which they are interested in respect of the reversion inasmuch as they assume that any Amount which shall be payable by the Company for injury done to any premises in which any such Lessee is interested will either be expended by the company in restoration of the premises injured, or will only be paid by them on the joint receipt of the Claimants or their Agent and the Lessee to the intent that the Claimants may have a control in the Expenditure thereof as they contend that the receipt of a Lessee alone for any compensation payable in respect of injury done to the premises demised [?] to him would not be a sufficient discharge for the same. If this View be incorrect the Claimants reserve to themselves the right to apply to the Sheffield Inundation Commissioners to allow a claim to be lodged in the respect of the matter aforesaid, presnant [?] to the provisions of section 43 of the above mentioned act. | ||||||||
| Windsor Street | ||||||||
| Warren Street | ||||||||
| £1001 | 9s | 2d | ||||||
| Assessed at | ||||||||
Corrections? Let us know >
|
|
|
We use cookies to provide you with the best browsing experience on our websites, [more].
If you continue, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies on the SHU websites.